Formal and Informal Language Use among University Students:  A Sociolinguistic Analysis

Zia Aliza; Naila Shakshiya; Suci Surianti; Wanda Riani; Ririn Wilda Artika; Rara Asyifa Elaqmar; Deasy Yunita Siregar

doi:10.61132/bima.v3i4.2546

Authors

Zia Aliza Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan
Naila Shakshiya Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan
Suci Surianti Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan
Wanda Riani Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan
Ririn Wilda Artika Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan
Rara Asyifa Elaqmar Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan
Deasy Yunita Siregar Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/bima.v3i4.2546

Keywords:

Clarity, communication, Contexts, Formal Language, Informal Language

Abstract

This article explores the distinctions between formal and informal language, focusing on their unique features, intended purposes, and appropriate usage contexts. Informal language tends to be more relaxed, spontaneous, and commonly used in casual conversations. In contrast, formal language is structured, respectful, and predominantly employed in academic, professional, and official environments. The study emphasizes how choosing the right language style impacts communication by affecting clarity, tone, and overall effectiveness. The differences between vocabulary choices, grammatical structures, and communicative intentions are examined to show how language style influences interaction. Understanding when to use formal or informal language enables speakers and writers to adapt more easily to various social situations. This adaptability not only improves communication but also helps in fostering better understanding across different contexts, ensuring that the message is received in the intended manner. By mastering the appropriate use of both language styles, individuals can enhance their communication skills and navigate diverse social settings more effectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2), 145–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X

Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus linguistics: Investigating language structure and use. Cambridge University Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Chaer, A., & Agustina, L. (2010). Sosiolinguistik: Perkenalan awal. Rineka Cipta.

Crystal, D. (2003). Language and the internet. Cambridge University Press.

Crystal, D. (2011). Internet linguistics: A student guide. Routledge.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Holmes, J. (2013). An introduction to sociolinguistics (4th ed.). Routledge.

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.

Lakoff, R. (1972). Language in context. Language, 48(4), 907–927. https://doi.org/10.2307/411994

Meyerhoff, M. (2019). Introducing sociolinguistics (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Tagliamonte, S. A. (2012). Variationist sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation. Wiley-Blackwell.

Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2015). An introduction to sociolinguistics (7th ed.). Wiley Blackwell.

Yule, G. (2016). The study of language (6th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Zhang, W., & Wang, Y. (2020). Formal and informal language use in online academic communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 39(3), 391–410.