Flouting Maxim sebagai Tanda Perlawanan pada Novel Woman At Point Zero: Kajian Pragmatik Grice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/bima.v4i2.2836Keywords:
Conversational Maxim Violation, Gender Inequality, Grice’s Cooperative Principle, Implicature, PragmaticsAbstract
This study examines the violations of Grice’s cooperative principles in the novel Woman at Point Zero by Nawal El Saadawi. The research employs a pragmatic approach and a text-based qualitative descriptive method. Dialogues in the novel are used as the primary data to identify violations of the maxims of quality, quantity, relevance, and manner, as well as to analyze the implicatures generated through the characters’ utterances. The findings reveal that the violations of conversational maxims are not merely incidental, but function as communicative strategies closely related to the female characters’ experiences within a patriarchal social structure. The utterances that violate the cooperative principles reflect the characters’ attempts to conceal trauma, express rejection indirectly, maintain self-worth, and criticize unequal power relations. In addition, these maxim violations represent the psychological pressure and limited space for expression experienced by women in society. Therefore, language in the novel functions not only as a medium for storytelling, but also as a symbolic tool for conveying resistance, personal experiences, and social criticism toward gender inequality. The study further demonstrates that pragmatic analysis, particularly through implicature and maxim violations, can help uncover deeper meanings in literary works by connecting language, social context, and the lived experiences of the characters.
Downloads
References
Arifah, S. (2024). Pelanggaran maksim tutur kualitas dan kuantitas dalam program Kick Kontroversi (Ganjar-Mahfud mulai ngebut) di Metro TV: Perspektif pragmatik. AUFKLARUNG: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia, dan Pembelajarannya, 3(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.51574/aufklarung.v3i1.1077
Asdar, H., Andi, & Asia, M. (2021). Pembelajaran pragmatik. CV. Semiotika.
Bartlett, T. (2014). Analysing power in language: A practical guide. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315851938
Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Harvard University Press.
Gunarwan, A. (1994). Pragmatik: Pandangan mata burung. Universitas Indonesia.
Hidayati, N. N. (2018). Pelanggaran maksim (flouting maxim) dalam tuturan tokoh film Radio Galau FM: Sebuah kajian pragmatik. An-Nas: Jurnal Humaniora, 2(2), 248–263. https://doi.org/10.36840/an-nas.v2i2.108
Iswah Adriana, H. (2018). Pragmatik. Pena Salsabila.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
Mahsun. (2017). Metode penelitian bahasa: Tahapan, strategi, metode, dan tekniknya. Rajawali Pers.
Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Ratih, R., & Arianti, R. (2025). Pelanggaran prinsip kerja sama dalam novel Si Anak Spesial karya Tere Liye. Jurnal Basataka (JBT), 8(2), 1008–1015. https://doi.org/10.36277/basataka.v8i2.1013
Saadawi, N. E. (1983). Woman at point zero (S. Hetata, Trans.). Zed Books. (Karya asli diterbitkan tahun 1975)
Sumarlam, Pamungkas, S., & Susanti, R. (2017). Pemahaman dan kajian pragmatik. Bukukatta.
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. Longman.
Wibisono, G., Kusmiyati, & Faizin, A. (2023). Analisis pelanggaran dan pematuhan prinsip kerja sama pada novel Pasangan Sempurna karangan Asri Aci. Jurnal Ilmiah FONEMA, 6(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.25139/fn.v6i1.6131
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Bima : Pusat Publikasi Ilmu Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






