Peran Metode Pembelajaran Total Physical Response dan Motivasi Belajar terhadap Keterlibatan Belajar Siswa Sekolah Minggu Buddha Vihara Vimuttara Jambi

Jampawongchai Jampawongchai; Partono Partono; Budiutomo Budiutomo; Muljadi Muljadi

doi:10.61132/yudistira.v4i3.2977

Authors

Jampawongchai Jampawongchai SekolahTinggi Ilmu Agama Buddha Smaratungga
Partono Partono SekolahTinggi Ilmu Agama Buddha Smaratungga
Budiutomo Budiutomo SekolahTinggi Ilmu Agama Buddha Smaratungga
Muljadi Muljadi SekolahTinggi Ilmu Agama Buddha Smaratungga

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/yudistira.v4i3.2977

Keywords:

Active Learning, Buddhist Religious Education, Buddhist Sunday School, Learning Motivation, Student Engagement, Total Physical Response

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of the Total Physical Response (TPR) Learning Method and Learning Motivation on the Learning Engagement of students at Buddhist Sunday Schools (SMB) across Vihara Vimuttara Jambi. This study employed a quantitative approach using a causal correlational survey method. The independent variables in this study were the TPR Learning Method (X1) and Learning Motivation (X2), while the dependent variable was Student Learning Engagement (Y). Data were collected through questionnaires distributed to teachers and students of Buddhist Sunday Schools across Vihara Vimuttara Jambi. The data were analyzed using simple linear regression, multiple linear regression, and correlation analysis to examine the partial and simultaneous effects among the variables. The results showed that the TPR Learning Method had a positive and significant effect on Student Learning Engagement, with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.756 and a coefficient of determination of R² = 0.571 (57.1%). Learning Motivation also had a positive and significant effect on Student Learning Engagement, with a correlation coefficient of r = 0.658 and a coefficient of determination of R² = 0.433 (43.3%). Simultaneously, the TPR Learning Method and Learning Motivation made a significant contribution to Student Learning Engagement. In conclusion, the better the implementation of TPR and the higher the Learning Motivation, the higher the Student Learning Engagement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms, goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261

Asher, J. J. (1977). Learning another language through actions. Sky Oaks Productions.

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1.

Corno, L., & Mandinach, E. B. (1983). The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 18(2), 88–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461528309529266

Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1992). Teaching elementary students through their individual learning styles. Allyn and Bacon.

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

Entwistle, N. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-09106-2

Fakhri. (2023). Academic motivation as a predictor of student engagement in secondary education. Journal of Educational Psychology Studies, 15(2), 112–125.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Heriyanti, Ibrahim, & Taslim. (2025). Improving students' English achievement through Total Physical Response method. Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(1), 45–56.

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057

Journal of Social Sciences. (2024). Motivation and student engagement in secondary education. Journal of Social Sciences, 18(3), 201–214.

Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development. Harper & Row.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook II: Affective domain. David McKay.

Linlin, L., & Jamaludin, N. (2024). The effect of Total Physical Response on students' vocabulary mastery and participation. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(1), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v13-i4/23674

McClelland, D. C. (1987). Human motivation. Cambridge University Press.

Nasution, A. F., & Tarigan, F. N. (2024). Students' motivation and engagement through Physical Response based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 31(2), 134–146.

Ngo Hai, T., Nguyen, P. T., & Le, M. H. (2025). The relationship between academic motivation and student engagement in higher education. International Journal of Educational Research, 118, 102–118.

Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 315–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9

Pitaloka, D., Wigati, S., & Suryaman, M. (2025). Students' engagement through Total Physical Response in vocabulary learning. Journal of English Studies, 7(1), 23–35.

Rahmawati, I., Rahman, A., & Bunyamin. (2025). The use of Total Physical Response to improve students' vocabulary mastery. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 12(1), 67–78.

Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn. Charles Merrill.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806

Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.

Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(3), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(88)90023-7

Universitas Negeri Jakarta. (2024). Pengaruh motivasi belajar terhadap student engagement siswa sekolah menengah. Jurnal Psikologi Pendidikan, 16(2), 89–101.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wilson, B. G. (2002). Active learning environments. In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. Lawrence Erlbaum.