Pengembangan Partisipatif Modul Pendampingan Sosial Berbasis Socio-Ecological Approach untuk Ketahanan Keluarga Prasejahtera dalam Family Development Session

Nararia Hutama Putra; Anan Sutisna; Fitri Khoiriyah Parinduri; Asma Syifa Nabihah; Intan Purnama Dewi; Sri Koeswantono; Fera Kuraysia; Khusni Mubaroq; Adi Susilo; Muhamad Fadilah Mutaqin; Tiara Gayatri

doi:10.61132/sadewa.v4i4.3197

Authors

Nararia Hutama Putra Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Anan Sutisna Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Fitri Khoiriyah Parinduri Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Asma Syifa Nabihah Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Intan Purnama Dewi Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Sri Koeswantono Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Fera Kuraysia Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Khusni Mubaroq Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Adi Susilo Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Muhamad Fadilah Mutaqin Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Tiara Gayatri Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/sadewa.v4i4.3197

Keywords:

Family Development Session, Participatory Action Research, Plain Language, Social Assistance, Socio-Ecological Approach

Abstract

Family Development Session (FDS) in Indonesia's Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) is intended to strengthen family resilience, yet its facilitation tends to be linear and overlooks the multilayered social systems around poor families. This study aimed to refine a socio-ecological approach–based social assistance module designed to strengthen the resilience of low-income families, involving prospective users as co-researchers. A one-cycle participatory action research design was used, consisting of planning, action, observation, and reflection. Six participants joined a focus group discussion in Semarang Regency: three youth organisation (Karang Taruna) members, two PKH social workers, and one community leader. Data were collected through a feedback sheet containing three rating items, preferred features, open-ended suggestions, and willingness to try the revised product. Closed items were analysed descriptively, while open responses were analysed thematically through two cycles of coding. All participants rated the prototype as easy to use and useful, and all were willing to try the revised version, while clarity of language received the lowest score. Seventeen units of meaning produced four themes: readability and language register, platform accessibility, multimodal learning and appeal, and socio-cultural contextualisation. All participants asked for simpler language, the youth members requested a mobile application that works offline, and the social workers and community leader requested videos and local visuals. The reflection stage closed the cycle with five revision decisions. Socio-ecological modules for adult learners must translate academic concepts into everyday language and local media, and participatory refinement reveals needs that rating scales miss.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alha, F., Nasuhaidi, N., Romadhon, A., & Subekti, D. (2026). Budaya politik masyarakat dalam mendukung implementasi program bantuan sosial di Kelurahan Rantau Indah Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Timur. Mandub: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora, 4(2), 108–116. https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v4i2.3078

Annisa, A., & Yulindrasari, H. (2021). Family Development Session of the Indonesian Family Welfare Program. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Early Childhood Education (ICECE 2020) (Vol. 538, pp. 61–66). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210322.014

Annisa, Y. (2023). Local resource-based women empowerment model through Family Development Session (FDS). JPPM (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat), 10(2), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.21831/jppm.v10i2.59644

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674028845

Cornish, F., Breton, N., Moreno-Tabarez, U., Delgado, J., Rua, M., de-Graft Aikins, A., & Hodgetts, D. (2023). Participatory action research. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-023-00214-1

Darmawan, D., Hadiyanti, P., Yatimah, D., Sasmita, K., & Lei, W. (2023). Development of an interactive multimedia module on andragogy for community education tutors. Journal of Nonformal Education, 9(2), 259–263. https://doi.org/10.15294/jne.v9i2.46594

Dewi, A. N. (2022). Penyelenggaraan kegiatan Family Development Session (FDS) pada sesi pengasuhan dan pendidikan anak di Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH). Indonesian Journal of Adult and Community Education, 3(2), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijace.v3i2.43596

Fania, A., & Ramadhan, S. (2026). Pemanfaatan media multimodal dalam pembelajaran keterampilan membaca teks berita. Intellektika: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 4(4), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.59841/intellektika.v4i4.3782

Fanni, A. A., Kusumawardhani, H., & Adielyani, D. (2026). Edukasi bijak finansial untuk memperkuat ketahanan ekonomi keluarga nelayan di Desa Tapak, Kelurahan Tugurejo, Kota Semarang. Perigel: Jurnal Penyuluhan Masyarakat Indonesia, 5(2), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.56444/perigel.v5i2.3759

Fayanto, S., Ulfa, S., Praherdhiono, H., Shinta, N. D., Takda, A., Sahara, L., & Balulu, N. (2023). Design of Exophysics: Book-based mobile application for literacy learning in the remote access areas of Indonesia. Journal of Learning for Development, 10(3), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v10i3.846

Istiani, A. N., & Mansyur, M. (2022). Analysis of communication media assistance on the Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH) in the implementation of Family Development Session (FDS). Komunika, 5(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.24042/komunika.v5i1.11303

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2

Knowles, M. S., Holton, E. F., Swanson, R. A., & Robinson, P. A. (2020). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development (9th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429299612

Komarawati, K., Nurdin, M. F., Gunawan, W., & Nurwati, R. N. (2025). Transformative capacity to build an adaptive society resilience during crisis: Evidence from conditional cash transfer/PKH Indonesia. Frontiers in Sociology, 10, Article 1507177. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1507177

Lazfihma, Ismawati, D., Fuadi, D. S., Sari, D. L., & Afrodita, M. (2026). Effectiveness of the Ignatian Cybergogical Experience model in improving students' digital literacy: An andragogical approach. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 40(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.21009/PIP.401.4

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Lipscomb, S. T., Kwon, K.-A., Jeeries, P., & Giordano, F. (2024). Editorial: Resilience processes and children's development within socio-ecological contexts. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1429178. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1429178

Mayer, R. E. (2024). The past, present, and future of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1

Nadia, I., Shodiqin, A., & Marfuah, L. L. A. (2024). Peran pendamping sosial dalam Program Keluarga Harapan (PKH). Tamkin: Jurnal Pengembangan Masyarakat Islam, 9(3), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.15575/tamkin.v9i3.31591

Nugroho, T. W., Hanani, N., Toiba, H., & Sujarwo, S. (2022). Does social capital improve food security? Evidence from the Indonesian Family Life Survey. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 12(2), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.55493/5005.v12i2.4502

Purwandia, I., & Mardliyah, S. (2022). Family Development Session sebagai upaya peningkatan keterampilan hidup keluarga penerima manfaat di Kelurahan Lidah Wetan. J+PLUS Unesa: Jurnal Mahasiswa Pendidikan Luar Sekolah, 11(1), 95–104.

Putikadea, I., Permatasari, I., Amirusholihin, Pratama, A. R., & Rawi, D. B. T. R. (2025). Pendayagunaan fasum melalui urban farming dalam meningkatkan kesejahteraan ekonomi keluarga di Desa Pabean. KREATIF: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara, 5(4), 632–644. https://doi.org/10.55606/kreatif.v5i4.8833

Putra, N. H., Dalimunthe, H. H. B., & Koeswantono, S. (2023). Dampak partisipasi aktif KPM PKH dalam Family Development Session untuk menguatkan ketahanan ekonomi keluarga. JKKP (Jurnal Kesejahteraan Keluarga dan Pendidikan), 10(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.21009/JKKP.102.05

Putra, N. H., Parinduri, F. K., Purnama, I. D., Nabihah, A. S., Br D, H. H., Adisaputra, J., Mubaroq, K., Susilo, A., & Wiyogi, A. F. (2026). AI-integrated transformative learning model to strengthen the personal and interpersonal dimensions of lifelong learning capacity among community education students at Universitas Negeri Jakarta. In A. D. Utami et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Environmental Learning and Educational Technologies (3rd ICELET 2025) (Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, Vol. 1007, pp. 178–183). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-567-6_21