Navigating Challenges: Exploring Cadets' Perspectives on Maritime Cyber Resilience in STIP Jakarta's Semester 3 Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/sadewa.v1i4.542Keywords:
Cadet Perspectives, Language Development, Maritime Cyber Resilience, Maritime Education, Professional CompetencesAbstract
This qualitative study investigates the perspectives of 240 Semester 3 cadets at the Maritime Institute Jakarta (STIP Jakarta) regarding An Operational Approach to Maritime Cyber Resilience. Over three semesters, the research scrutinizes cadets' academic self-checked intelligence, perceived professional competences, motivations, and the interplay between language development and preparedness for global roles. The demographic diversity of the cadet sample, representing majors in Nautical, Technical, and Port and Shipping Management, ensures a comprehensive exploration of maritime education. The findings reveal a positive evolution in cadets' understanding of maritime cyber resilience, with a notable increase in academic self-checked intelligence. The curriculum's effectiveness in cultivating a nuanced comprehension of cyber threats is underscored by the enhanced professional competences perceived by cadets, indicating preparedness for the practical challenges in the maritime industry. Motivations and engagement exhibit a positive trajectory, from initial challenges to sustained interest, indicating the subject's growing relevance over time. The interconnected development of English language proficiency and subject mastery emphasizes the need for targeted language support within maritime education. The positive correlation between improved language fluency and a deeper understanding of maritime cyber resilience suggests the symbiotic relationship between linguistic and technical competence. The study's implications extend beyond STIP Jakarta, offering insights for refining maritime education globally. Recommendations encompass dynamic pedagogical approaches, continual curriculum evaluation, industry collaboration, and language enhancement initiatives. By embracing these recommendations, maritime education programmes can foster a resilient cadre of professionals adept at navigating the complexities of the modern maritime industry.
References
Albayrak, T., & Ziarati, R. (2012). Encouraging research in maritime education & training. Journal of Maritime Transport and Engineering, 1(1), 4–9.
Analysing Data and Interpreting Findings. (2013). In Critical Thinking Skills for Education Students (pp. 32–50). SAGE Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526408129.n4
Bailey, A., & Ngwenyama, O. (2009). Social ties, literacy, location and the perception of economic opportunity: Factors influencing telecentre success in a development context. 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 1–11.
Balkin, R. (2006). The international maritime organization and maritime security. Tul. Mar. LJ, 30, 1.
Christodoulou-Varotsi, I., & Pentsov, D. A. (2008). The STCW Convention and related instruments. Maritime Work Law Fundamentals: Responsible Shipowners, Reliable Seafarers, 422–639.
Comtois, C., & Slack, B. (2017). Sustainable development and corporate strategies of the maritime industry. In Ports, Cities, and Global Supply Chains (pp. 249–262). Routledge.
de la Peña Zarzuelo, I., Soeane, M. J. F., & Bermúdez, B. L. (2020). Industry 4.0 in the port and maritime industry: A literature review. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 20, 100173.
Erdogan, O., & Demirel, E. (2017). New Technologies in Maritime Education and Training, Turkish Experiment. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(6), 947–952.
Ferritto, V. R. (2016). Maritime education factors and presenteeism: a comparative quantitative study. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 15, 353–380.
House, D., & Saeed, F. (2016). The seamanship examiner: for STCW certification examinations. Taylor & Francis.
IMO, S. C. E. (2018). IMO. London.
Lebeničnik, M., & Starčič, A. I. (2020). Examining the contemporary digital divide of university students with specific reference to students with special educational needs. In British Journal of Educational Technology (Vol. 51, Issue 6, pp. 2422–2441). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12920
Lee, T. W., Mitchell, T. R., & Sablynski, C. J. (1999). Qualitative research in organizational and vocational psychology, 1979–1999. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 55(2), 161–187.
Manuel, M. E. (2017). Vocational and academic approaches to maritime education and training (MET): Trends, challenges and opportunities. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 16, 473–483.
Organization, I. M. (2009). Maritime English (Vol. 3). IMO Publishing.
Saldana, J. (2014). Thinking qualitatively: Methods of mind. SAGE publications.
Sharma, A., Kim, T., Nazir, S., & Chae, C. (2019). Catching up with time? Examining the STCW competence framework for autonomous shipping. Proceedings of the Ergoship Conference, Haugesund, Norway, 24–25.
Tohara, A. J. T., Shuhidan, S. M., Bahry, F. D. S., & Nordin, M. N. Bin. (2021). Exploring Digital Literacy Strategies for Students with Special Educational Needs in the Digital Age. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(9), 3345–3358.
Trenkner, P. (2009). Maritime English requirements and the revised STCW. Szczecin: Proceedings of the International Maritime English Conference IMEC, 21, 5–10.
Willig, C. (2014). Interpretation and analysis. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, 481.
Young, C. (1995). Comprehensive Revision of the STCW convention: an overview. J. Mar. L. & Com., 26, 1.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Sadewa : Publikasi Ilmu Pendidikan, pembelajaran dan Ilmu Sosial
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
