Desain Instruksional Pembelajaran Matematika Pada Materi Bangun Ruang Untuk Siswa Kelas VII SMP

Amarta Prayuti; Tian Abdul Aziz; Flavia Aurelia Hidaja; Lukman El Hakim

doi:10.61132/sadewa.v2i3.996

Authors

Amarta Prayuti Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Tian Abdul Aziz Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Flavia Aurelia Hidaja Universitas Negeri Jakarta
Lukman El Hakim Universitas Negeri Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/sadewa.v2i3.996

Keywords:

Instructional Design, Mathematics, Problem-based Learning, Teaching at The Right Level

Abstract

In the world of education, instructional design development is important to do in order to create improvements in the teaching and learning process. The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of instructional design design in learning mathematics in class VII junior high school building materials. The research method used is Systematic Literature Review using several article reviews indexed by Sinta and Scopus. The search for article reviews was carried out on several platforms including google scholar and eric. The results showed that the learning design used the Problem-based Learning model with the Teaching at the Right Level approach with the help of technology and several assessment instruments. Further details of the learning design are explained in detail in the results and discussion section of this article.

References

Ayarsha, R. (2016). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam mengerjakan soal matematika berdasarkan kriteria Watson [Undergraduate thesis].

Brown, A. H., & Green, T. D. (2015). The essentials of instructional design: Connecting fundamental principles with process and practice (3rd ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=ysoBCgAAQBAJ

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction.

Fang, S. C., Hsu, Y. S., Chang, H. Y., Chang, W. H., Wu, H. K., & Chen, C. M. (2016). Investigating the effects of structured and guided inquiry on students’ development of conceptual knowledge and inquiry abilities: A case study in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12), 1945–1971. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1220688

Gagné, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=c1MmAQAAIAAJ

Mager, R. F. (2012). Making instruction work, or, Skillbloomers: A step-by-step guide to designing and developing instruction that works. Mager Associates. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=S8HjNAEACAAJ

Palayukan, H., & Pelix, L. (2018). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal perbandingan trigonometri pada segitiga siku-siku berdasarkan kriteria Watson di kelas X SMA Katolik Rantepao. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 4(1), 47–60.

PISA. (2023). PISA 2022 results factsheets Indonesia. The Language of Science Education, 1, 1–9. https://oecdch.art/a40de1dbaf/C108

Ramlawati, R., Liliasari, L., Martoprawiro, M. A., & Wulan, A. R. (2014). The effect of electronic portfolio assessment model to increase of students’ generic science skills in practical inorganic chemistry. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 8(3), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v8i3.260

Roubides, P. (2015). An instructional design process for undergraduate mathematics curriculum online. Procedia Computer Science, 65, 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.09.083

Yang, K. L., Cheng, Y. H., Wang, T. Y., & Chen, J. C. (2023). Preservice mathematics teachers’ reasoning about their instructional design for using technology to teach mathematics. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 248–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2023.2198116