Perbandingan Rasa Ingin Tahu Siswa antara Model Brain Based Learning dengan Strategi Role Playing dan Problem Based Learning pada Materi Usaha dan Energi

S. Yakobus Eko Setiawan; Nancy Susianna; Nerru Pranuta Murnaka

doi:10.61132/bima.v4i3.2968

Authors

S. Yakobus Eko Setiawan Universitas Katolik Parahyangan
Nancy Susianna Universitas Katolik Parahyangan
Nerru Pranuta Murnaka Universitas Katolik Parahyangan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/bima.v4i3.2968

Keywords:

Brain Based Learning, Curiosity, Problem Based Learning, Role Playing, Work And Energy

Abstract

Curiosity is a fundamental character that drives student engagement in abstract physics learning. This study aims to compare students' curiosity between classes implementing Brain Based Learning with Role Playing strategy (BBL-RP) and Problem Based Learning (PBL) on Work and Energy topic. The study employed a quasi-experimental design with Nonequivalent Control Group Design. The sample consisted of 53 tenth-grade students at SMA Trinitas Bandung, with 26 students in the experimental class and 27 students in the control class. The instrument was an 8-item curiosity questionnaire adapted from the Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II with two dimensions: Stretching and Embracing. Data were analyzed using Independent t-test and Cohen's d effect size. The results showed significant differences in total curiosity (t(51) = 2.066, p = 0.044) and Embracing dimension (t(51) = 2.335, p = 0.024) with moderate effect sizes (d = 0.57 and d = 0.64). However, the Stretching dimension showed no significant difference (t(51) = 1.179, p = 0.244) with a small effect size (d = 0.32). These findings indicate that BBL-RP is more effective in enhancing students' curiosity, particularly in the aspect of embracing challenges and uncertainty. Practically, physics teachers are advised to integrate role playing strategies in learning to optimize students' emotional and cognitive engagement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arends, R. I. (2008). Learning to teach: Belajar untuk mengajar (7th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Damasio, A. (2009). Memahami kerja otak: Mengendalikan emosi & mencerdaskan nalar. Baca.

Given, B. K. (2007). Brain-based teaching: Merancang kegiatan belajar mengajar yang melibatkan otak, emosional, sosial, kognitif, dan reflektif. Kaifa.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Immordino-Yang, M. H. (2015). Emotions, learning, and the brain: Exploring the educational implications of affective neuroscience. W. W. Norton & Company.

Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00004.x

Jensen, E. (2008). Memperkaya otak: Cara memaksimalkan potensi setiap pembelajar. INDEKS.

Jensen, E. (2011). Pembelajaran berbasis otak. INDEKS.

Kashdan, T. B., Gallagher, M. W., Silvia, P. J., Winterstein, B. P., Breen, W. E., Terhar, D., & Steger, M. F. (2009). The curiosity and exploration inventory-II: Development, factor structure. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 987–998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.04.011

Niyanti, E., P. Setyaningru, P., F. Putri, F., Rachman, G. W., & Wandita, F. (2022). Implementasi pembelajaran fisika topik usaha dan energi berdasarkan publikasi ilmiah. Mitra Pilar: Jurnal Pendidikan, Inovasi, dan Terapan Teknologi, 1(2), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.58797/pilar.0102.05

Solso, R. L., MacLin, O. H., & MacLin, M. K. (2008). Psikologi kognitif (Ed. 8). Erlangga.

Sousa, D. A. (2012). Bagaimana otak yang berbakat belajar. INDEKS.

Sousa, D. A. (2017). How the brain learns (5th ed.). Corwin Press.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Syarifuddin, S., Nusantara, T., Qohar, A., & Muksar, M. (2020). Students’ thinking processes connecting quantities in solving covariation mathematical problems in high school students of Indonesia. Participatory Educational Research, 7(3), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.35.7.3

Wardani, S., Ikbal, S., & Dani, A. U. (2026). Pengaruh model pembelajaran PBL berbasis pendekatan berdiferensiasi terhadap hasil belajar peserta didik materi usaha dan energi. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Sains (JPFS), 4(1), 17–23.

Wulandari, N., & Perdana, R. (2023). Keefektifan model brain-based learning terintegrasi kearifan lokal untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar kognitif dan motivasi peserta didik pada topik usaha energi. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains, 11(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpms.v11i2.67902