Pemarkah Stansial dalam Buku Biografi Gus Dur Serta Implementasinya Terhadap Pembelajaran Teks Biografi Kelas X
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/nakula.v3i6.2325Keywords:
Analysis, Biography, Gus, Language, Stansial, Stasial scorerAbstract
A biography book is a written work that is compiled based on factual events about a person's life, but writers are often faced with the choice of how to represent the reality surrounding the characters they are telling. In the process of writing, a writer not only gathers facts, but also interprets and highlights certain aspects of the character's life. This can be seen through the way language is used, including standard markers, which reflect the author's attitude and position towards the facts raised. This research aims to analyze the author's attitude towards this reality, as reflected through the use of stationary markers in the biography of President Abdurrahman Wahid (Gus Dur) by Greg Barton. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach with a content (text) analysis method. The source of research data is in the form of Gus Dur's biographical text which is analyzed by referring to five categories of standard markers, namely hedges, boosters, attitude markers, self-mentions, and engagement markers. Each category provides an overview of how the author conveys an argument, expresses an attitude, and builds a closeness with the reader. The results of the study show that the use of boosters dominates, which illustrates the author's firm attitude in emphasizing facts and assessments of Gus Dur. In addition, the word "like" is found 253 times and serves as a means of building common knowledge and creating an inclusive delivery style. This analysis also shows that Greg Barton tried to maintain a balance between scientific objectivity and personal closeness to the characters he wrote. This research has relevance in Indonesian language learning in high school, especially class X, because biographical texts are part of the teaching material. These findings can be used as evaluation and learning materials about the author's language style, as well as helping students hone critical reading skills and writing narrative discourse by understanding the meaning behind the language choices used.
Downloads
References
Almurashi, W. A. (2016). An introduction to Halliday's systemic functional linguistics. Journal for the Study of English Linguistics, 4(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.5296/jsel.v4i1.9423
Amran, H. F., Hendri, K., Yulita, N., Studi, P., Kebidanan, S., Stikes, B., & Negeri, P. (2023). Application of storytelling method in improvement meaning of life in the elderly at Daycare Aisyiyah Pekanbaru. JIKA (Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan Abdurrab), 1(2), 138-144.
Ardi, H. (2015). Ekspresi pagar dan terjemahannya pada novel To Kill A Mockingbird. PRASASTI: Conference Series, 429-435.
Ayendi, H. S., & Juita, N. (2022). Frekuensi dan tipe hedges pada artikel di ScienceDirect.com bidang pengajaran bahasa dan politik. Lectura: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(2), 221-233. https://doi.org/10.31849/lectura.v13i2.10376
Cazares-Cervantes, A., LaGue, A., & Dykeman, C. (2019). Authorial stance in counselling research articles. PsyArXiv. http://psyarxiv.com/discover?q=authorial%20stance%20on%20counseling. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8q539
Chafidha, L. N., & Mujiyanto, J. (2021). The comparative study of hedges in theses' abstracts written by English and Indonesian graduate programs of Universitas Negeri Semarang. The Journal of Educational Development, 9(2), 91-100.
Fadly, A. (2020). Keterlibatan penulis melalui aspek kebahasaan dalam buku teks pelajaran berlandasan Kurikulum 2013. Pena Literasi, 3(1), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.24853/pl.3.1.297-306
Hidayati, F., & Dallyono, R. (2015). The use of hedges and boosters as rhetorical devices in the construction of speeches. Linguistik Indonesia, 33(1), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001
Hyland, K. (1998). Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Texts, 18(3), 349-382. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
Hyland, K. (2005a). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.
Hyland, K. (2005b). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
Hyland, K., & Jiang, K. (2018). "In this paper we suggest": Changing patterns of disciplinary metadiscourse. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.02.001
Hyland, K., & Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25, 156-177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156
Mahanani, W., & Dewi, R. (2016). Analisis hedges dalam kolom opini surat kabar The Jakarta Post terhadap kampanye Pilpres 2014. Bangun Rekaprima: Majalah Ilmiah Pengembangan Rekayasa, Sosial dan Humaniora, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.32497/bangunrekaprima.v1i2.699
Qomariana, Y., & Soetama, P. L. (2021). Stance of Indonesian writers in journal articles. Lingual: Journal of Language and Culture, 12(2), 48. https://doi.org/10.24843/LJLC.2021.v12.i02.p07
Rahardi, R. K. (2019). Integrating social, societal, cultural, and situational contexts to develop pragmatics course learning materials: Preliminary study (Integrasi sosial, sosial, budaya, dan konteks situasional untuk mengembangkan materi pembelajaran pragmatik: Studi awal). Jurnal Gramatika: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(2), 169-178. https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.2019.v5i2.3572
Rohim, D. C., Rahmawati, S., & Ganestri, I. D. (2021). Konsep asesmen kompetensi minimum meningkatkan kemampuan literasi numerasi siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Varidika, 33(1), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v33i1.14993
Sari, D. M., Nababan, M., & Santosa, R. (2021). Analisis penggunaan ekspresi booster sebagai piranti retorik pada presentasi di TED.com. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Linguistik dan Sastra (SEMANTIKS), 2, 481-489.
Vergie, M. P. (2025). Academic writing in an ODeL institution: Stance and engagement in study guides for first-year students. UnisaRxiv. https://doi.org/10.25159/UnisaRxiv/000117.v2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Nakula : Pusat Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Ilmu Sosial

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.