Peran Mahasiswa MBKM Mandiri dalam Kegiatan P5 Siswa Kelas XI di SMAK Giovanni Kupang Tahun Pelajaran 2024/2025

Febrianus Borkonda Tanis; Natalia Twignarti Alfilia Nanga; Archangela Chriani Mbeo Bai; Margaretha Mbere Cherista; Skolastika Gae Nua; Kristinus Sembiring

doi:10.61132/pandawa.v3i1.1644

Authors

Febrianus Borkonda Tanis Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira
Natalia Twignarti Alfilia Nanga Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira
Archangela Chriani Mbeo Bai Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira
Margaretha Mbere Cherista Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira
Skolastika Gae Nua Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira
Kristinus Sembiring Universitas Katolik Widya Mandira

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/pandawa.v3i1.1644

Keywords:

Student, Independent MBKM, P5

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the role of independent Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) students in the implementation of the Project to Strengthen the Pancasila Student Profile (P5) for grade 11 students at SMAK Giovanni Kupang in the 2024/2025 academic year. The results of the study show that the involvement of MBKM students has a significant impact on the success of P5 activities. MBKM students act as facilitators, peer tutors, and sources of knowledge that enrich student learning. Their presence helps students understand abstract concepts, develop soft skills, and increase motivation to learn. Overall, the collaboration between students, teachers, and MBKM students in P5 activities has created a more dynamic and effective learning environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of educational objectives (Abridged edition). Pearson Education.

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university. McGraw-Hill Education.

Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term. Routledge.

Brew, A. (2013). Teaching and research: New relationships and new challenges. Routledge.

Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1987). Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 39(7), 3-7.

Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and blended learning and teaching. Australian Educational Computing, 22(1), 6-16.

Gibbs, G. (2010). Dimensions of quality. Higher Education Academy.

Harvard University. (2019). Building effective learning environments in higher education. Harvard University Press.

Jolliffe, D. (2007). The use of interactive learning in higher education. The Association for Learning Technology.

Jung, I., & Rha, H. (Eds.). (2005). Distance education and the traditional university: A comparison of perspectives. Springer.

Kemendikbud. (2020). Buku panduan merdeka belajar-kampus merdeka (1st ed., Vol. 1). Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kemdikbud RI.

Kemenristek Dikti. (2020). Pedoman pelaksanaan merdeka belajar kampus merdeka (Vol. 1). Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia.

Larkin, M. T. (2019). The role of active learning in the development of critical thinking and creative thinking skills in higher education. Higher Education Studies, 9(4), 124-135. https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v9n4p124

McArthur, S. M. (2017). Integrating experiential learning into the curriculum: The role of service learning in higher education. Journal of Education and Human Development, 6(2), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v6n2a5

Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research (Vol. 2). Jossey-Bass.

Pedoman Penerapan Kurikulum Dalam Rangka Pemulihan Pembelajaran. Pub. L. No. 56/M/2022 (2022). https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/file/1692927430_manage_file.pdf

Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Sahlberg, P. (2011). The Finnish education system and its impact on society: A journey from policy to practice. European Journal of Education, 46(1), 10-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2011.01428.x

Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (2001). Coherence and congruence: Implications for self-regulation and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 251-263. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.251

Wong, V. (2021). Opini: Program Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) membentuk kesiapan karier yang komprehensif bagi mahasiswa. Kompasiana. https://www.kompasiana.com/valenciawong0136/61b616b906310e5e1d013393/opini-program-merdeka-belajar-kampus-merdeka-mbkm-membentuk-kesiapan-karier-yang-komprehensif-bagi-mahasiswa