Kebijakan Pemerintah Terhadap Pendidikan Di Indonesia Menuju Perguruan Tinggi Unggul

Yayuk Zulaikah; Mujamil Qomar; Abd. Aziz

doi:10.61132/yudistira.v2i3.797

Authors

Yayuk Zulaikah UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatulullah Tulungagung
Mujamil Qomar UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatulullah Tulungagung
Abd. Aziz UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatulullah Tulungagung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/yudistira.v2i3.797

Keywords:

Government Policy, Education, Higher Education

Abstract

The purpose of writing this article is to find out the government's policy towards education in Indonesia towards superior universities. This research uses a type of library research. Library research is research carried out by reviewing various journals and related reference books. The results of his research show that achieving accreditation for PTKIN is now an absolute necessity. Because institutional accreditation is a set of assessments that directly evaluates the management and quality of each higher education institution. Since 2020, accreditation assessment for new universities and study programs has been implemented based on 9 criteria, so that in the future the accreditation process for these two study programs will use an assessment system based on 9 criteria. Realizing PTKIN to be able to achieve an A (excellent) accreditation score can be done through a technical management approach to superior PTKIN institutional accreditation. This technical management is the basis for preparing forms and complete documents and the accreditation visitation process. Technical management covers a fairly broad scope. So that ideally technical management is understood comprehensively by higher education administrators. So that institutional accreditation can reach an A (excellent) grade.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Basuki Wibawa, Manajemen Pendidikan Teknologi Kejuruan dan Vokasi, Cetakan Ke-1, Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara, 2017

Djaffar Lessy, Dinar Riaddin, Nanang Supriadi dan Nurlaila Sehuwaky, Implementasi Akreditasi Program Studi Berbasis 9 Kriteria Menuju Peringkat Unggul, Jurnal Idaarah, Vol. VI, No. 1, 2022, 16.

Endah Rantau Itasari dan Erwin, Instrumen Suplemen Konversi (ISK) Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi (BAN-PT) Dan Akibat Hukumnya, Jurnal Pacta Sunt Servanda, Volume 4 Nomor 1 2023 , 297.

Evi Khoirun Nisa, Analisis Pengaruh Akreditasi Program Studi Terhadap Intensitas Belajar dan Harapan Masa Depan, Jurnal At-Taqaddum, Vol.10 No.2 (2018), 206.

L Han dan S. Hayduk, Gaining Competitive Advantages in Higher Education: Analyzing the Gap Between Expectactions and Perceptions of Service Quality, International Journal of Value Based Management, Vol. 16. No. 13. 2003, 223.

Nisa Islami, Manajemen Teknis Akreditasi Institusi Unggul Bagi Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri (PTKIN), Jurnal Tawadhu, Vol. 2 no. 2, 2018, 601.

Nisa Islami, Manajemen Teknis Akreditasi Institusi Unggul Bagi perguruan tinggi keagamaan islam negeri (PTKIN), Jurnal Tawadhu, Vol. 2 No. 2, 2018,

Oddy Adam Noegroho, et.al, Pengaruh Experiential Marketing dan Brand Trust terhadap Kepuasan Pelanggan dan Loyalitas Pelanggan, Jusnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB), Vol. 6 No. 2, 2017, 4.

Pusdatin Kemenristekdikti Statistik Pendidikan Tinggi Tahun 2020, Jakarta: Pusdatin Iptek Dikti, Setjen, Kemenristekdikti, 2020

Safrudin Aziz, Manajemen Mutu Perguruan Tinggi: Koreksi dan Implementasi. Yogyakarta: Gava Media, 2016

Sedarmayanti dan Fedianty Augustinah, Strategi Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan Guna Mewujudkan Universitas Unggul, Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Publik dan Kebijakan Sosial - Vol. 3 No. 2 2019, 457.

Sudiyono, Manajemen Pendidikan Tinggi, Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta, Cetakan ke-1, 2004

Tim Penyusun Phoenix, Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia, Jakarta: Pustaka Phoenix Edisi Baru, 2007