Politeness Strategies in Social Media
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61132/arjuna.v3i6.2573Keywords:
Digital Communication, Online Discourse, Politeness Strategies, Positive Politeness, Social MediaAbstract
This study examines the use of politeness strategies in social media interactions, focusing on user comments addressed to public figures. As social media increasingly functions as a public communication space, language use within it reflects not only personal expression but also social norms, power relations, and considerations of face. Despite the informal and anonymous nature of online platforms, users often display strategic language choices to manage interpersonal relationships and avoid face-threatening acts. This research aims to identify the types of politeness strategies employed by social media users, determine the most dominant strategy, and explain the reasons underlying its use. The study adopts a qualitative descriptive approach. The data consist of 100 purposively selected comments collected from Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube, taken from posts by three highly visible public figures: a head of state, a global music celebrity, and a technology entrepreneur. Data analysis is guided by Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory, which categorizes strategies into positive politeness, negative politeness, bald on record, and off record. The findings indicate that positive politeness is the most frequently used strategy (78%), followed by negative politeness (11%), bald on record (10%), and off record (1%). The dominance of positive politeness suggests that social media users tend to maintain friendliness, show approval, and express respect, particularly when interacting with figures of authority or high public status. These findings demonstrate that digital communication continues to mirror offline social norms and highlight the continued relevance of politeness theory in online discourse.
Downloads
References
Bousfield, D., & Locher, M. A. (2020). Impoliteness and power in language. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813085
Chen, Y., & Lin, C. H. (2021). Politeness strategies in online comments: A case study of Taiwanese netizens. Journal of Pragmatics, 173, 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.01.004
Culpeper, J. (2021). Impoliteness and the weak social consequences of mass digital communication. Journal of Politeness Research, 17(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2019-0021
Darics, E., & Koller, V. (2020). Language in business, language in politics: New tools for analyzing political discourse on social media. Discourse & Society, 31(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926519889101
Dynel, M. (2021). COVID-19 memes going viral: On the multiple multimodal voices behind face masks. Discourse & Society, 32(2), 175-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520970385
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York, NY: Doubleday.
Graham, S. L., & Hardaker, C. (2021). (Im)politeness in digital communication. Journal of Pragmatics, 186, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.09.002
Haugh, M. (2020). Politeness re-examined: Face, im/politeness and social practice. Journal of Pragmatics, 166, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.003
Hernández-López, M., & Fernández-Amador, M. (2020). Politeness and impoliteness strategies in political discourse on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics, 170, 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.010
Holmes, J. (2013). An introduction to sociolinguistics (4th ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833057
Kádár, D. Z., & Haugh, M. (2021). Understanding politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kádár, D. Z., & Ran, Y. (2021). Politeness, power and face in digital interaction: A pragmatic perspective. Journal of Politeness Research, 17(2), 173-196. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2020-0028
Limberg, H., & Locher, M. A. (2022). Advice, facework and politeness in online public interaction. Internet Pragmatics, 5(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00042.lim
Locher, M. A., & Graham, S. L. (2021). Interpersonal pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108954105.030
Márquez-Reiter, R., & Limberg, H. (2022). The pragmatics of online interaction: Politeness, identity and stance in digital discourse. Internet Pragmatics, 5(2), 199-221. https://doi.org/10.1075/ip.00050.mar
Mullany, L., & Adolphs, S. (2021). Politeness, power and identity in digital discourse. Discourse, Context & Media, 40, 100465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100465
Page, R., Barton, D., Unger, J. W., & Zappavigna, M. (2014). Researching language and social media. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771786
Renner, A., & Reber, E. (2023). Mitigation and facework in user comments on COVID-19 regulations: A politeness-theoretical analysis. Pragmatics and Society, 14(1), 99-121. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.00082.ren
Sifianou, M. (2019). Im/politeness and cultural variation. Journal of Politeness Research, 15(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2018-0020
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2018). Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory (2nd ed.). London: Bloomsbury.
Subekti, A. S. (2020). Positive and negative politeness strategies used by Indonesian netizens in online debates. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 844-857. https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.759385
Tagg, C., & Seargeant, P. (2020). Taking offence on social media. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615184
Yule, G. (2017). The study of language (6th ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, Y., & You, X. (2023). Facework and politeness strategies in user comments on social networking sites. Pragmatics and Society, 14(3), 421-443. https://doi.org/10.1075/ps.00095.zha
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Arjuna : Publikasi Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa dan Matematika

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



