Penggunaan Kembali Istilah Organisasi Papua Merdeka (OPM) Oleh TNI: Analisis Alasan dan Hubungannya dengan Prinsip Negara Hukum

Yuliana Rahmi Salsabila; Rahmawati Ramadhani; Lostauli Pane

doi:10.61132/sadewa.v2i2.864

Authors

Yuliana Rahmi Salsabila Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
Rahmawati Ramadhani Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji
Lostauli Pane Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/sadewa.v2i2.864

Keywords:

OPM, Law, Human Rights

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to explore the reasons behind the TNI's change of name from KST or KKB to OPM, as well as the relevant principles of the rule of law. The TNI Commander issued a decree on this matter based on acts of terror and violations of human rights committed by the group in the Papua region, which have threatened national security. One of the principles of the rule of law owned by the State of Indonesia is the guarantee of human rights by law. The Indonesian government wants to resolve this conflict not only through a military approach, but also with economic, educational, health, and political approaches. The name change has raised public concerns about an increase in military operations that could harm civilians because there is no guarantee of protection from weapons activities that might occur. In addition, this name change is only carried out by the TNI alone and needs support from many parties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Edon, S. F. L., & Hidayat, N. A. (2021). Kewajiban Pemerintah Indonesia Terhadap Pelanggaran Ham Yang Dilakukan Oleh Kelompok Kriminal Bersenjata (Kkb) Di Papua. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha, 9(3), 854–869. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPP/article/view/39160

Ibrahim. (2015). METODOLOGI PENELITIAN KUALITATIF (E. Kurnanto, Ed.). Bandung.

Kusuma, A. J., Setiawan, M. C. A., Ilmar, A., & Situmeang, N. (2022). Perubahan Status Organisasi Papua Merdeka (Opm) Menjadi Organisasi Teroris Oleh Pemerintah Indonesia: Sebuah Analisis Dalam Perspektif Ham. JOURNAL OF GOVERNMENT (Kajian Manajemen Pemerintahan Dan Otonomi Daerah), 7(2), 1–22. https://journal.uta45jakarta.ac.id/index.php/gov/article/view/6087

Kuswoyo. (2024, April 12). Paradigma Keliru Panglima TNI Melihat Papua. Koran.Tempo.Co. https://koran.tempo.co/read/editorial/488052/opm-konflik-papua

Mardiani, I. P., Anisah, I., Hasibuan, M., & Fadilah, N. (2021). Konflik internal Antara pemerintah Indonesia dengan gerakan separatis Di Papua. Jurnal Syntax Fusion, 1(2), 49–57. http://fusion.rifainstitute.com/index.php/fusion/article/view/12

Matildha, M. (2022). TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PENETAPAN STATUS ORGANISASI PAPUA MERDEKA SEBAGAI KELOMPOK TERORIS. LEX ADMINISTRATUM, 10(1). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/administratum/article/view/38297

Nainggolan, R. S. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Pemberlakuan Status Organisasi Papua Merdeka (Opm) Dari Kelompok Kriminal Bersenjata (KKB) Menjadi Teroris Di Papua. Lex Privatum, 10(5). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/42869

Perdana, I. (2016). Prinsip Negara Hukum Dalam Kehidupan Sebagai Warga Negara. Warta Dharmawangsa, 47. https://jurnal.dharmawangsa.ac.id/index.php/juwarta/article/view/230

Tjitra, A. T. (2024, April 15). Perubahan Istilah KKB Jadi OPM: Kronologi, Kritikan hingga Langkah Pendekatan TNI di Papua. Nasional.Tempo.Co. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1856753/perubahan-istilah-kkb-jadi-opm-kronologi-kritikan-hingga-langkah-pendekatan-tni-di-papua

Perundang-undangan:

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 2018

Undang-Undang No. 39 Tahun 1999

Undang-Undang No. 34 Tahun 2004