Prinsip Kemanusiaan Dan Pembatasan Kekerasan: Pendekatan Hak Asasi Manusia Global dan Islamic Sociological Jurisprudence Theory

Authors

  • Ahmad Muhamad Mustain Nasoha Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • Arsya Fahrezi Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta
  • Lanang Elwas Khawaridzmi Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/nakula.v4i3.2783

Keywords:

International Humanitarian Law, Limitation of Violence, Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah, Principle of Humanity, Substantive Justice

Abstract

This study is motivated by the growing gap between the normative principle of humanity in global human rights law and the practice of limiting violence in increasingly complex contemporary conflicts, particularly in the context of asymmetric warfare and the use of modern technology. The objective of this research is to critically analyze the integration between the principle of humanity in international law—especially through the principles of proportionality and distinction—and the framework of Islamic Sociological Jurisprudence Theory, which is oriented toward maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah and substantive justice. This research employs a normative juridical approach using a literature study method with a conceptual and comparative analysis of various sources of international law and contemporary Islamic law. The findings indicate that the procedural and calculative nature of global human rights law has not fully addressed the complexity of humanitarian impacts in modern conflicts, thereby necessitating a more holistic approach. The integration with Islamic Sociological Jurisprudence Theory proves to enrich the analysis by emphasizing the protection of life, public welfare, and a substantive evaluation of the impacts of violence, both direct and long-term. The implications of this study highlight the importance of reconstructing a paradigm of violence limitation that is more adaptive, humanistic, and contextual through a synthesis of universal values and Islamic ethical-theological principles in order to strengthen the protection of human dignity in the contemporary era.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abou El Farag, Mohamed Salem, dan Tarek Rashed. 2023. “The Impact of Maqasid Al Shariah (Objectives of Islamic Shariah) to Obtain Legal Protection of Humans; A Comparative and Analytical Study of the Qatari Laws.” Journal of Law and Sustainable Development 11(9 SE-Artigos):e983. doi:10.55908/sdgs.v11i9.983.

Acosta-lópez, Juana Inés, dan Mariana Chacón Lozano. 2025. “EDITORIAL SYMPOSIUM ON COLOMBIA ’ S SPECIAL JURISDICTION FOR PEACE.” International Review of the Red Cross 107(930):853–65. doi:10.1017/S1816383126101064.

Ahmed, Habib. 2025. “Islamic Normative Legal Theory: Framework and Applications.” Journal of Law and Religion 40(1):28–58. doi:DOI: 10.1017/jlr.2025.10056.

Al-dafrawi, Ahmad Saad Ahmad, dan Muhammad Tahir Yahya. 2025. “Reconciling Maslahah and the Rule of Distinction in the Yemen Conflict.” Prophetic Law Review 7(2):199–255. doi:https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol7.iss2 .art3 Reconciling.

Alias, Muhammad Nazir, Muhammad Najib Abdullah, Mohd Farihal Osman, Nor Faizah Ismail, dan Mohd Sham Kamis. 2025. “The Position of Maqasid al-Shariah within Islamic Legal Sources: A Comprehensive Analysis.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam 9(2):937–64. doi:10.22373/q4byre51.

Almahfali, Mohammed, dan Helen Avery. 2023. “Human Rights from an Islamic Perspective : A Critical Review of Arabic Peer-Reviewed Articles.” MDPI: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute 12(106):1–21.

Arafat, Muhammad, dan Asmuni. 2025. “Implementation of Maqashid al-Syariah in Islamic Criminal Law in Muslim Countries: A Comparative Study in Saudi Arabia, Iran, Malaysia, and Indonesia.” AL-SULTHANIYAH 14(1):45–68. doi:10.37567/al-sulthaniyah.v14i1.3577.

Atqiya, Ashfiya Nur, Ahmad Muhammad Mustain Nasoha, Cahya Juwanti Arum Sari, Nurmi Syahidah, dan Rifky Azuan Syahlevi. 2025. “Kewarganegaraan dan Hak Asasi Manusia : Perspektif Hukum Nasional dan Hukum Islam.” Hukum Inovatif: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora 4(2018):141–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.62383/humif.v2i1.943.

Daniele, Luigi. 2024. “Incidentality of the civilian harm in international humanitarian law and its Contra Legem antonyms in recent discourses on the laws of war.” Journal of Conflict and Security Law 29(1):21–54. doi:10.1093/jcsl/krae004.

Dorsey, Jessica. 2025. “The erosion of human(e) judgement in targeting? Quantification logics, AI-enabled decision support systems and proportionality assessments in IHL.” International Review of the Red Cross 107(930):1041–71. doi:DOI: 10.1017/S1816383125100969.

Hayat, Imran. 2023. “Islamic Law and International Human Rights Norms : Convergence , Divergence , and Pathways toward Harmonisation.” MRJ: Al-Mahdi Research Journal 5(1):49–70. https://ojs.mrj.com.pk/index.php/MRJ/article/view/143.

Junaidi, J., M. A. R. Abqa, M. Abas, D. Suhariyanto, A. B. Nugraha, F. Yudhanegara, M. M. Rohman, H. Sholihah, M. Rafi’ie, dan I. Dhahri. 2023. HUKUM & HAK ASASI MANUSIA : Sebuah Konsep dan Teori Fitrah Kemanusiaan Dalam Bingkai Konstitusi Bernegara. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. 2025. “Maqasid and Human Rights” diedit oleh M. H. Kamali. Goals and Purposes of Shariah: Maqasid in Theory and Practice 0.

Maroonian, Anais. 2022. “Proportionality in International Humanitarian Law: A Principle and a Rule.” https://lieber.westpoint.edu/proportionality-international-humanitarian-law-principle-rule/.

Masnun, Muh Ali, Dicky Eko Prasetio, dan Maalikatussofa. 2025. “Reconstruction of the Normative Legal Research Paradigm in Responding to Global Challenges : An Epistemological Analysis.” Novum: Jurnal Hukum 12(3):372–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.2674/novum.v12i03.74364.

Mir, Khalid Hussain, dan Rafique Anjum. 2025. “Universal Ethics for a Divided World: Maqasid al-Shari’ah and the Pursuit of Human Brotherhood.” Journal of Islamic Studies and Culture 13:21–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.15640/jisc.v13p3.

Nasoha, Ahmad Muhammad Mustain, Ashfiya Nur Atqiya, dan Imam Abdullah. 2025. “Criminal Law in Muslim-Majority Countries : Balancing Sharia , Human Rights , and Global Standards.” Shahih 10(1):1–18. doi:10.22515/shahih.v10i1.10038.

Nasoha, Ahmad Mustain. 2026. “Reformulasi Rechtsvinding Hakim Pengadilan Agama Dalam Putusan Hak Asuh Anak : Perspektif Fiqh Perbandingan Mazhab Dan Kesejahteraan Anak.” UNIVERSITAS SEBELAS MARET SURAKARTA.

Nijs, Maxime. 2020. “Humanizing siege warfare : Applying the principle of proportionality to sieges.” International Review of the Red Cross 102(914):683–704. doi:10.1017/S1816383121000680.

Nijs, Maxime. 2024. “International Humanitarian Law: Rules, Controversies, and Solutions to Problems Arising in Warfare Marco Sassòli.” Journal of Conflict and Security Law 29(3):391–97. doi:10.1093/jcsl/krae010.

Salsabila, Adzanah Mariska. 2025. “Konvergensi Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah dan Prinsip Humaniter Internasional Terhadap Jarimah al-Harbiyyah Adzanah.” Al-Jina’i Al-Islami 2(2):95–106.

Sassòli, Marco, dan Laura M. Olson. 2008. “The relationship between international humanitarian and human rights law where it matters: admissible killing and internment of fighters in non-international armed conflicts.” International Review of the Red Cross 90(871):599–627. doi:10.1017/S1560775508000072.

Soofi, Ahmer Bilal, dan Muhammad Khalid Masud. 2024. International Law and Maqasid Al-Shariah. doi:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4937103.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-22

How to Cite

Ahmad Muhamad Mustain Nasoha, Arsya Fahrezi, & Lanang Elwas Khawaridzmi. (2026). Prinsip Kemanusiaan Dan Pembatasan Kekerasan: Pendekatan Hak Asasi Manusia Global dan Islamic Sociological Jurisprudence Theory . Jurnal Nakula : Pusat Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa Dan Ilmu Sosial, 4(3), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.61132/nakula.v4i3.2783

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.