Menganalisis Alat Evaluasi Pada Mata Pelajaran IPA Siswa Kelas V di SDN 105292 Bandar Klippa Kecamatan Percut Sei Tuan

Authors

  • Dini Puspa Sari Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Octariani Br Manik Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Widya Ramadhani Lubis Universitas Negeri Medan
  • Syahrial Syahrial Universitas Negeri Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/sadewa.v2i2.745

Keywords:

Analysis, Evaluation Tools, Science Subjects

Abstract

The aim of this research is 1) to find out what assessments are used in science subjects at Riigi Algkooli 105292 Bandar Klippa, Percut Sei Tuan District, Class V, 2) to analyze the quality of assessment tools according to the rules. reliability and competence. Class V Science Exam Difficulties and Different Advantages of SD Negeri 105292 Bandar Klippa, Percut Sei Tuan District. The research method used is descriptive qualitative, namely. description of phenomena that occur in reality. All subjects were class V students at SD 105292 Bandar Klippa. As a primary data source, data sources are obtained from teachers and students, and as secondary data sources, documentation and questionnaires. Data was collected through observation, questionnaires and tests. Meanwhile, data analysis was carried out using validation tests, test reliability, difficulty and distinguishing power. Validation was carried out by the researchers themselves and the validation expert group. Based on the results of observations, it is known that the question format used by teachers in evaluating scientific learning is multiple choice questions consisting of 15 questions, filler questions consisting of 10 numbers, and descriptive questions consisting of 10 questions. 15 questions. of 5 questions. The results of the validation test show that not all multiple choice questions are valid, only 4 out of 15 questions are valid. The form has 5 valid questions and all descriptive questions are recognized as valid. Expert validation also showed that of the 4 experts, only 1 expert showed that the results were quite valid, 3 validation experts showed that the questions were less valid. The reliability test shows that the multiple choice questions are not reliable, while the fill-in-the-blank and description questions are considered reliable. The difficulty level test shows that multiple choice questions have 3 categories of difficulty, namely hard, medium and easy questions, while for questions that can be filled in and are descriptive, only 2 categories of difficulty are found, namely. intermediate questions and easy questions. Finally, the differential power test shows that multiple choice questions have 4 different power categories, namely poor, sufficient, good, and very good. Meanwhile, there were excellent results on questions about filling in and describing different styles.

References

Ali, M. dan Ashori, 2011. M,Psikologi Remaja Perkembangan Peserta Didik, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Anas Sudijono, 1995. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Arikunto, S. i2013. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Asep Jihad dan Abdul Haris, 2013. Evaluasi Pembelajaran, Yogjakarta; Multi Pressindo.

Azwar, Saefuddin. 2001. Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Azwar, saifuddin. 2010. Dasar-dasar psikometri. Yogyakarta: pustaka pelajar.

Baiquni, 1983. Islam dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Modern, Jakarta : Pustaka ITB.

Cannon, Joseph P, William D. Perreault, Jerome McCarthy. 2009. Pemasaran Dasar Edisi 16 Pendekatan Manajerial Global Buku 2. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba Empat.

Daryanto, 1997. Evaluasi pendidikan, Solo; Rineka Cipta.

Daryanto, 1999. Evaluasi Pendidikan, Jakarta; Rineka Cipta.

Departemen Agama RI, 2015. Al-Qur’an dan terjemahannya. CV. Darus Sunnah; Jakarta.

Depdiknas. 2003. Materi Pelatihan Peningkatan Kemampuan Guru Dalam Penyusunan dan Penggunaan Alat Evaluasi Serta Pengembangan Sistem

Dimyati dan Mudjiono, 2006. Belajar dan Pembelajaran, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Djaali., dkk. 2000. Pengukuran Dalam Pendidikan. Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana.

Penghargaan Terhadap Siswa, Jakarta i: Direktorat PLP – Ditjen Dikdasmen.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-22

How to Cite

Dini Puspa Sari, Octariani Br Manik, Widya Ramadhani Lubis, & Syahrial Syahrial. (2024). Menganalisis Alat Evaluasi Pada Mata Pelajaran IPA Siswa Kelas V di SDN 105292 Bandar Klippa Kecamatan Percut Sei Tuan . Jurnal Sadewa : Publikasi Ilmu Pendidikan, Pembelajaran Dan Ilmu Sosial, 2(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.61132/sadewa.v2i2.745

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.