Development of an Evaluation Model for the Islamic Education Curriculum Based on Deep Learning and Panca Cinta in Madrasah

Authors

  • Rodianto Rodianto Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan
  • Shellvaria Paparingga Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan
  • Abdul Khobir Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan
  • Moh. Muslih Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan
  • Slamet Untung Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/bima.v4i2.3088

Keywords:

Curriculum Evaluation, Deep Learning, Islamic Education, Madrasah, Panca Cinta

Abstract

This article aims to develop a conceptual model for curriculum evaluation in Islamic Education based on deep learning and Panca Cinta in madrasah institutions. The study is motivated by the need for Islamic education curriculum evaluation that does not only assess document completeness and cognitive achievement, but also captures the quality of learning processes, assessment practices, value internalization, and students’ character transformation. This research employs a library research method using an integrative literature review and policy analysis approach. The data sources include nationally accredited journals (Sinta 1 and Sinta 2), Scopus-indexed international journals, primary books on curriculum and educational evaluation, as well as government policy documents related to the national curriculum and madrasah curriculum. The data were analyzed using content analysis, thematic analysis, and conceptual synthesis. The findings indicate that Islamic education curriculum evaluation needs to be constructed holistically by integrating Tyler’s evaluation theory, CIPP, Stake’s Countenance Model, and Discrepancy Evaluation Model. This article produces the EKPI-DLPC Model, which stands for Evaluation of Islamic Education Curriculum Based on Deep Learning and Panca Cinta. The model consists of five dimensions: curriculum context, curriculum design, learning process, assessment, and value impact. The EKPI-DLPC Model positions deep learning as a pedagogical foundation and Panca Cinta as an evaluative value framework. This model contributes to shifting Islamic education curriculum evaluation in madrasahs from an administrative-oriented approach toward a more holistic, reflective, and transformative evaluation system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, M. A. (2024). From dialogue to engagement: Experiences of civil society organizations in religious literacy programs for multicultural education curriculum in Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 21(2), 264–274. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/tarbiyah/jpai/issue/view/533

Adiyono, A., Fadhilatunnisa, A., Rahmat, N. A., & Munawarroh, N. (2023). Islamic religious education learning outcomes evaluation: Implementation of steps, concepts, and solutions in public elementary school. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(4), 5208–5222. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i4.4384

Afif, N., Aziz, A., Mukhtarom, A., Mubin, F., & Lubis, M. R. (2024). Integrating Islamic values in online learning: A comparative study of Western and Islamic education philosophies. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.15408/tjems.v11i1.40392

Afriyanto, D., & Anandari, A. A. (2024). Transformation of Islamic religious education in the context of multiculturalism at SMA Negeri 9 Yogyakarta through an inclusive approach. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 21(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v21i1.7142

Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1980). The concept of education in Islam: A framework for an Islamic philosophy of education. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization.

Aryani, S. A., Waston, Mahmudulhasan, Wiranto, E. B., Asroni, A., Fauziah, S., & Yusup, M. (2024). Exploring student-centered learning as a tool to prevent radicalization in Islamic junior schools: A case study of Indonesia and Bangladesh. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 21(2), 329–345. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/tarbiyah/jpai/issue/view/533

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/thematic-analysis/book248481

Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: The three paradigms. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, Article 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100020

Fatmawati, E. (2025). Reconceptualizing assessment in Islamic education: A critical review of madrasah evaluation practices in the 21st century. Journal of Quality Assurance in Islamic Education, 5(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.47945/jqaie.v5i2.2376

Fauzi, M. R., Hamami, T., & Kim, H.-J. (2024). Islamic religious education curriculum innovation: Fethullah Gülen’s perspective. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 21(1), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v21i1.7089

Hamdi, Rizal, S. U., Hikmah, N., Syabrina, M., Sulistyowati, & Mualimin. (2024). Developing digital-based Islamic religious education teaching modules on the subject matter of Duha prayer in elementary schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 21(1), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v21i1.7520

Ilyas, E. L., Setyaningrum, N., & Sumarni, S. (2022). A model of inclusive education curriculum in Islamic education institutions: A case study in Banten Province, Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 19(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.2022.192-02

Jamil, Z. A., Nurhuda, Alfian, Ulfah, S. M., Rasidin, & Youssef, A. (2025). Program evaluation study on Islamic religious education in pesantren: Addressing educational degradation in the digital era. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 22(1), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v22i1.11358

Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2024a). Keputusan Menteri Agama Nomor 450 Tahun 2024 tentang pedoman implementasi kurikulum pada Raudhatul Athfal, Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, Madrasah Tsanawiyah, Madrasah Aliyah, dan Madrasah Aliyah Kejuruan. Retrieved from https://dki.kemenag.go.id/informasi/kma-no--450-tahun-2024---pedoman-implementasi-kurikulum-pada-madrasah

Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2024b). Jumlah satuan pendidikan RA, MI, MTs dan MA. Satu Data Indonesia. Retrieved from https://data.go.id/dataset/dataset/jumlah-satuan-pendidikan-ra-mi-mts-dan-ma

Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2024c). Jumlah siswa RA, MI, MTs dan MA. Satu Data Indonesia. Retrieved from https://data.go.id/dataset/dataset/jumlah-siswa-ra-mi-mts-dan-ma

Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2025). Keputusan Menteri Agama Nomor 1503 Tahun 2025 tentang perubahan atas Keputusan Menteri Agama Nomor 450 Tahun 2024 tentang pedoman implementasi kurikulum pada Raudhatul Athfal, Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, Madrasah Tsanawiyah, Madrasah Aliyah, dan Madrasah Aliyah Kejuruan. JDIH Kementerian Agama. Retrieved from https://jdih.kemenag.go.id/regulation/keputusan-menteri-agama-nomor-1503-tahun-2025-tentang-perubahan-atas-keputusan-menteri-agama-nomor-450-tahun-2024

Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Republik Indonesia. (2025a). Panduan pembelajaran dan asesmen Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, jenjang Pendidikan Menengah: Edisi revisi tahun 2025. Retrieved from https://repositori.kemendikdasmen.go.id/33290/

Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Republik Indonesia. (2025b). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Nomor 13 Tahun 2025 tentang perubahan atas Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 12 Tahun 2024 tentang kurikulum pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan jenjang Pendidikan Menengah. Retrieved from https://peraturan.go.id/id/permendikdasmen-no-13-tahun-2025

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2024). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Nomor 12 Tahun 2024 tentang kurikulum pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan jenjang Pendidikan Menengah. Retrieved from https://www.peraturan.go.id/files/permendikbudristek-no-12-tahun-2024.pdf

Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (4th ed.). SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/content-analysis/book258450

Maksudin. (2023). Uncovering the moral nexus, morality, akhlaq, and character in Islamic religious education: A comprehensive conceptual analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 20(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v20i1.6936

Matzavela, V., & Alepis, E. (2021). Decision tree learning through a predictive model for student academic performance in intelligent m-learning environments. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, Article 100035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100035

Mumtaz, N. M., Muafiah, E., & Witro, D. (2024). Educational policy analysis: Examining pesantren policies and their implications on the independence of kyai and pesantren in the contemporary era. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 21(2), 287–306. Retrieved from https://ejournal.uin-suka.ac.id/tarbiyah/jpai/issue/view/533

Nurdin, A., Hendra, H., Khozin, K., Haris, A., Zainab, N., & Yahaya, M. Z. (2024). Developing the Islamic religious education curriculum in inclusive schools or madrasah and its implementation: A systematic literature review. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 21(1), 94–110. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v21i1.6907

Priestley, M., Alvunger, D., Philippou, S., & Soini, T. (2021). Curriculum making: A conceptual framing. The Curriculum Journal, 32(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.90

Provus, M. M. (1971). Discrepancy evaluation for educational program improvement and assessment. McCutchan.

Sidik, F., Vachruddin, V. P., Rusydiyah, E. F., Pertiwi, A. S., & Darmawan, M. A. (2024). Conceptualization of the integrated Islamic religious education curriculum: A literature study at Imam Hatip Schools Turkey and MAN Insan Cendekia Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 21(1), 111–130. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v21i1.7617

Sinnema, C., Nieveen, N., & Priestley, M. (2020). Successful futures, successful curriculum: What can Wales learn from international curriculum reforms? The Curriculum Journal, 31(2), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.17

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Stake, R. E. (2004). Standards-based and responsive evaluation. SAGE Publications.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and applications (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Susanti, S. S., Nursafitri, L., Hamzah, I., Zunarti, R., Darmanto, Fitriyah, Asy’arie, B. F., & Sa’ad, M. S. (2024). Innovative digital media in Islamic religious education learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 21(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v21i1.7553

Taba, H. (1962). Curriculum development: Theory and practice. Harcourt, Brace & World.

TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society. (2025). Islamic Education 4.0: Rethinking moral and religious learning for a digital age. TARBIYA: Journal of Education in Muslim Society, 12(1), 1–18. Retrieved from https://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/tarbiya/article/view/46161

Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606

Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Rodianto Rodianto, Shellvaria Paparingga, Abdul Khobir, Moh. Muslih, & Slamet Untung. (2026). Development of an Evaluation Model for the Islamic Education Curriculum Based on Deep Learning and Panca Cinta in Madrasah. Jurnal Bima : Pusat Publikasi Ilmu Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 4(2), 260–274. https://doi.org/10.61132/bima.v4i2.3088

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.