Analisis Butir Soal Pilihan Ganda Penilaian Akhir Semester pada Pembelajaran Tema 8 Praja Muda Karana Kelas III

Authors

  • Wildan Fajar Firdausa Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang
  • Denna Delawanti Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang
  • Yulianti Yulianti Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61132/sadewa.v3i2.1727

Keywords:

Thematic, Multiple Choice, Questions

Abstract

Evaluation is often carried out after learning activities to assess the extent to which learning objectives have been achieved. The purpose of item analysis is to identify which questions are good, not so good, and which are bad. This research was carried out with the aim of analyzing multiple choice questions for the final semester assessment in learning theme 8 class III. This type of research is descriptive quantitative research. Sampling used a simple random sampling technique. The data collected was in the form of a final semester assessment of theme 8 learning for class III students at SDN 01 Putat Kidul, Malang Regency, totaling 12 students. Based on the results of the analysis of multiple choice questions in the Final Semester Assessment, it has been shown that: Theme 8 questions have a validity index with a "valid" category of 22 questions and an "invalid" category of 8 questions. (2) The questions in theme 8 have a high reliability index, namely 1. This shows that the questions can measure consistently, which is what is called reliable. (3) Theme 8 has 17 questions that are classified as difficult and 13 questions that are classified as very easy. From the research results, information was obtained, namely questions on theme 8 with a "difficult" category of 60% (17 items), and a "very easy" category of 40% (13 items). (4) The differentiating power of Final Semester Assessment questions on theme 8 with the "very good" category is 15% (4 items), the "good" category is 20% (6 items), the "revised" category is 10% (3 items), the “replaced” by 55% (17 items). (5) The effectiveness of the End of Semester Assessment distractors on questions in theme 8 with the "very good" category at 30% (9 items), the "good" category at 60% (18 items), the "Not good" category at 7% (2 items ), the “bad” category is 3% (1 item). The conclusion of this research is that the questions are of good quality and the questions in theme 8 have a high or reliable reliability index.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agustina, R., Rustini, T., Wahyuningsih, Y. (2022). Analisis Butir Soal Penilaian Akhir Semester Muatan Pembelajaran IPS di Kelas 5: Ditinjau dari Kompetensi Abad 21. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 9 (1).

Anas, Sudijono. (2008). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. Hal 372

Arif, Muchamad. (2014). Penerapan Aplikasi Anates Bentuk Soal Pilihan Ganda. Universitas Trunojoyo Madura: Jurnal Ilmiah Edutic Vol. 1, No. 1, ISSN: 2407 – 4489

Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Arikunto, S. (2012). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Harjanto, A., Afryaningsih, Y., Fatmawati, R.A. (2022). Kedalaman Butir Soal Pilihan Ganda Penilaian Akhir Semester Ganjil Kelas V SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 2 (2).

Martunis, M., Ibnu Khaldum, dan Zulfadli. (2015). Analisis Kualitas Butir Soal Ujian Semester Genap Mata Pelajaran Kimia Kelas X MAN Model Banda Aceh Tahun Pelajaran 2014/2015 Menggunakan Program Proanaltes. Universitas Syiah Kuala: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kimia (JIMPK) Vol. 1, No.4

Muzayanah, Umi. (2015). Kualitas Butir Soal PAI Pada Ujian Sekolah Berstandar Nasional.

Balai Penelitian dan Pengembangan: Jurnal SMaRT, Vol. 1, No. 1

Ngadu, E., Iswahyudi, D., Chrisyarani, D.D. 2021. Analisis Keterampilan Guru Dalam Mengadakan Variasi Pada Pembelajaran Tematik Kelas V Sekolah Dasar Masehi Wee Pangali Sumba Tengah Tahun Pelajaran 2020/2021. Seminar Nasional PGSD Unikama, 5.

Rahayu, Rahmatika. (2016). Analisis Kualitas Soal Pra Ujian Nasional Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Akuntansi. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta: Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, Vol. XIV, No.1

Suharsimi, Arikunto. (2013). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara: Jakarta.

Halaman 75

Wahyuni, Sri, dan Abd. Syukur Ibrahim. (2012). Asesmen Pembelajaran Bahasa. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama

Widayanti, W., Bistari., Suparjan. (2021). Analisis Butir Soal Pilihan Ganda Penilaian Tengah Semester Pada Pembelajaran Tematik Kelas V Sekolah Dasar Negeri 39 Pontianak Kota. Jurnal DIDIKA: Wahana Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 7 (2).

Widoyoko, E. P. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran: Panduan Praktis Bagi Pendidik dan Calon Pendidik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar

Winarti, L., Indawati, N., Yulianti. 2021. Pengembangan E-Evaluation Berbasis Nilai Karakter Berbantuan Aplikasi Quiziz Pada Tema 6 Kelas V. Seminar Nasional PGSD Unikama, 5.

Zainal Arifin. (2013). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Downloads

Published

2025-04-16

How to Cite

Wildan Fajar Firdausa, Denna Delawanti, & Yulianti Yulianti. (2025). Analisis Butir Soal Pilihan Ganda Penilaian Akhir Semester pada Pembelajaran Tema 8 Praja Muda Karana Kelas III. Jurnal Sadewa : Publikasi Ilmu Pendidikan, Pembelajaran Dan Ilmu Sosial, 3(2), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.61132/sadewa.v3i2.1727

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.